Rev. John A. Frahm III
Concordia Lutheran Church, Williston, ND
We Lutherans, who are heirs of Johann Sebastian Bach and so many
other great composers of sacred music, certainly understand that various
instruments can be used faithfully in the liturgical context to God’s
glory. But what are some important considerations with respect to
music in the Divine Service in the way it is used and selected with
integrity?
Thesis I – Nothing comes into the Divine Service “as is” from the world’s use. It must be sanctified.
Music is powerful but this power can be both negative and positive,
and not simply from the perspective of taste or preference. Music can
manipulate the emotions and senses greatly regardless of context or
purpose. God calls out of darkness into His marvelous light and we
become holy as a gift of God when we are brought to faith in Christ our
crucified and risen Lord. God’s creation is and will be transformed
and on the Last Day God will make a new heaven and a new earth.
This end times reality impacts the Divine Service as well when
through the preached Word and the administered sacraments heaven comes
down to earth for us (Hebrews 12:22-24). The old Adam is put to death and buried and the new believer in Christ comes forth (Romans 6:5-11).
Yet this is a daily and hourly pattern of repentance and faith in the
absolution. For the steward of the mysteries of God, he must be aware
that his shepherding of the liturgical context must take into account
this baptismal rhythm of those working with the church music (1 Corinthians 4:1-2).
Out of the heart proceeds all kinds of sins, and yet also the Gospel
has its way with the life and heart of the believer from outside of us.
The old Adam must not have the upper hand. The law of God in the
third way He uses it does provide structure and order within the larger
life of the church as well. Our Confessions acknowledge this as well.
The old Adam does not worship the Lamb but himself and his own
predilections, sentiment, and power. Not only does the old Adam not
want God in Christ at the center, but he refuses to sit at the receiving
end of God’s Gospel gifts as one in need of rescue, cleansing, and
forgiveness. The old Adam will not say “soli Deo gloria” in
truth. The liturgical musician is one who lives in no other way than
from the Apostles’ doctrine, fellowship in the breaking of bread, and in
the prayers. Here catechesis from pastor to musician is essential –
whether to choir director, organist, instrumentalist, cantor, or
parishioner singing a chorale. The one who serves in these areas of
the church’s liturgical life needs to be formed by sound doctrine and
good practice from the start (lex orandi, lex credendi and vice versa).
Thesis
II – The theology of the Divine Service, its action and power, will
shape the character and type of music that is selected as liturgical
music and the way it is delivered.
The Apology of the Augsburg Confession defines the mass or liturgy as
“a public ministry” and this is said to square well with the showing
forth of the body and blood of Christ as well as the proclamation of the
Gospel (AC XXIV and Apology XXIV; Luke 22:27).
This means of grace language is declaring that the chief thing about
the service is that it is something God does for us. The liturgy is
first and foremost sacramental (gift) rather than sacrificial (return of
offering to God or response). We serve God because He first serves
us. We are called into communion with Jesus within the communion of His
people and receive from Him forgiveness, life and salvation. This is
the end of missions! This is a monergistic, Christocentric, cruciform
activity as opposed to a synergistic or anthropocentric activity.
Jesus is among us in the flesh as the One who serves, continuing to do
and teach in our midst.
The music is there in much the same way that the pastor is there for
the liturgy. It is there for the sake and purpose of the Word and
Sacraments. The music vests the voices of pastor, congregation, and
choir. If used well it may de-emphasize the personality and emphasize
the words of the musical piece in liturgy or song. Music in this way
serves as John the Baptist did in relation to Jesus – preparing the way,
pointing the way to Jesus. And this also is important as pointers or
symbols are not the thing themselves. But they have importance in
directing us to what is most important and real. The Word is greater
than the music. Music humbly submits to be a John the Baptist of
sorts. This may help answer the question of whether something strictly
constructed as “praise service” with a “praise band” is sufficiently
centered on the monergistic delivery of grace via the Word and
Sacraments and is reflective of the liturgical two-way street with its
initiating accent on what God does for us. We liturgy God because He
first liturgies us. So much of what we have today in the variety of
themed services like “traditional worship” (or “Classic Grace”) vs.
blended worship or contemporary vs. contemporary family friendly worship
is so much marketing like the flavors of a hip coffee shop. What is
the main thing in practice? Are traditional liturgical services in the
past and not contemporary or does contemporary mean really “beholden to
the zeitgeist”?
Thesis III – When speaking of liturgical music, we “set the music to the text” rather than the other way around.
The first table of the law commands us to have no other gods and to
not misuse the holy name of God. In liturgical music, God’s Word,
rightly divided, comes first as setting the priority and purpose of the
Services of God’s House. And this goes on continually in the Church
throughout the ages (Matthew 16:18; Jude 3).
Out of the Word of God comes everything that exists therefore the text,
the priority of the Word, the Gospel message comes first. Music is
set to the requirements, character, and message of the text as the power
of God for salvation present for us. The music does not (or should
not) presume that the biblical text or its right application has no
power on its own. This principle should be kept in mind by the one
choosing and delivering the music with the sound text. What is said of
music here presumes that the text is sound theologically (but that is a
subject for another time).
Obviously there are a variety of ways to deliver music for any given
biblical or liturgical text. With this said, however one may understand
it properly in this way: while many sermons may come from a particular
Gospel pericope, this does not mean that all sermons claimed to be
based on said pericope are therefore right, sound, and rightly dividing
the word of truth or based on sound exegesis. There are boundaries and
clear principles in what would be considered a right homiletical
application of a text, sound exegesis, and so forth. (Of course one
could choose to ignore that matter out of other motives or priorities
that reflect a divergence in theology from our standard.) So there is
variety and yet not libertine or indiscriminate variety based merely
upon preference, popular styles, pop Christian radio, neighborhood
marketing, opinion polls, or alien theologies from other confessions.
Likewise, the musical selection does not disregard the liturgical
structure of the service nor the church year nor the teaching of the
whole counsel of God. Neither can the music disregard the real
presence of Christ or the humility of sinners before the holy God who
saved us only out of pure divine Fatherly goodness and mercy.
Evangelism or recruitment cannot be substituted for justification by
grace alone as der Hauptartikel of the Christian faith (the
chief article by which the church stands or falls). In the Psalms the
text was often given to the Chief Musician. The text came first within
an occasion and then the music was brought to that to fit the purpose of
the text. As Johann Walther, the composer colleague of Luther, put it
aptly, “All music should be so arranged that its notes are in harmony
with the text” (Carl Schalk, Luther on Music: Paradigms of Praise, p.27).
Thesis
IV – Music is not a mediator between God and man, thus the means of
grace cannot be improved upon or made more effective by making the music
a reflection of the local culture or enticing the old Adam in a
religious way.
God alone is God. There is no getting around that fact. Jesus
Christ is the one who has made the atoning sacrifice once and for all
and there is none other who is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of
the world. He is the One who comes to us here and now in His Word and
Sacraments to deliver the benefits of Good Friday and Easter to us.
Since we are conceived and born in sin (Psalm 51:5) and likewise are native to death and sin (Ephesians 2:1-2) and we cannot naturally discern the things of the Spirit of God (I Corinthians 2:14),
it is not more likely to get converts by religious entertainment than
otherwise. Remember the explanation to the Third Article of the Creed
in the Catechism?
Of course, all the arts can be abused. Neither PowerPoint nor
icons, neither baroque music nor soft rock, are mediators between God
and men. The church has a culture all its own as the Word bears fruit
in the history of the Church in contrast to our surrounding culture.
And the music used in the liturgical context serves within a circle that
is more particular than merely the circle of Christian music for
devotions or casual listening. Despite what may be suitable or
satisfactory as music for Christians for relaxation, work, or devotions,
music for the unique context of the Divine Service and its purpose
comes under a different vocation from anything else and is set apart.
This might indeed help us answer, for example, the question of the
location in the sanctuary from which the musicians should deliver the
music or if a soloist or cantor is best front and center or not? Even
such music that may be called Christian in the pop culture of American
Evangelicalism and the charismatic movement is not necessarily or
automatically qualified for liturgical service given the greatly
differing theologies and purposes of music between that realm and the
confessional Lutheran understanding of liturgy for the Church.
God has called His sheep into His green pastures in the Divine
Service. It is not we who invite God to the gathering. He initiates
the giving of His gifts. Music is summoned into the liturgical context
as an “Amen” to the structure of texts in the liturgy and church year.
To praise God is to praise His marvelous deeds (I Peter 2)
not merely to emote or speak in testimonials whether in old Pietism or
in new American revivalistic ways. So the music is to go along with
the text rather than to direct us back to our own filthy rags. In this
way the Word of Christ dwells among us richly with the prominence and
reverence that is truly meet, right, and salutary.
11 August 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Thank you for your contribution, Pr. Frahm. I look forward to reading what you've written and considering it carefully.
A study of the Exodus shows the difference between God's way and fallen mankind's way, between sacred and secular. God takes what is secular and makes it sacred by brining it into His use according to His pattern. Fallen man takes what is sacred and makes it secular by bringing it into man's use according to man's pattern. So God takes wood and gold, hides and tapestries and builds an earthly pattern of the heavenly tabernacle. And while God is dictating this sacred use of the secular to Moses, the Israelites under Aaron's supervision are busy taking the sacred name (reputation) of the LORD and placing it on an object they themselves have made to fit with the worship of manmade culture. Establishing the secular within the sacred (making the sacred secular) in order to make the sacred more appealing to fallen mankind is the same symptom of the same disease showing itself in yet another generation: Corrupt and obstinate, slow to learn and heed the lessons of those who have gone before. It is to dress up the Bride of Christ in the clothes of a Harlot. Christ continues to call out: "Whoever is for the Lord, come to Me. Come out of her, My people, so that you will not participate in her sins and receive of her plague."
Are our pastors telling us the truth?
Are Christian pastors honest with their congregations regarding the evidence for the Resurrection? Is there really a "mountain of evidence" for the Resurrection as our pastors claim or is the belief in the Resurrection based on nothing more than assumptions, second century hearsay, superstitions, and giant leaps of faith?
Check out this Lutheran pastor's defense of the Resurrection and a review by one of his former parishioners who lost his faith and is now an nonbeliever primarily due to the lack of good evidence for the Resurrection:
http://www.lutherwasnotbornagain.com/2016/06/a-review-of-lcms-pastor-john-bombaros.html
Post a Comment